A pioneer in the land of nonfiction television, Barbara Walters seems always to be reminding people to remind people that she is the first to break the network news glass ceiling. “And here’s the thing:” We’ve continued watching her, not because she is necessarily the most insightful or the most compelling journalist, but because she is the one asking the questions. She has amplified her television presence by showcasing some of the world’s most fascinating personalities – the ones we want to see. We watch her...to watch them.
Yes…Barbara Walters is a master at managing the limelight, as her memories attest.
In Walters’ earliest recollections, we are struck by a rather remarkable pattern and theme in regards to the way she sees her world. In all three recollections, the narrative pattern is the same. She initially has us going in one direction, and then, boom... we are turned right around toward an unforeseen, yet positive outcome…for Barbara Walters.
For example, in the first memory, we find seven-year-old Barbara convalescing alone and friendless in her hospital room, even closing her eyes to the company of perhaps a dutiful nurse entering the room to check on her. Only later does she discover the intruder was her own mother, unexpectedly (or maybe not) bringing Barbara’s favorite doll to the hospital to keep her company. Alas, even with eyes closed, Barbara still gets rewarded.
In the second memory, we see Barbara wanting to please her mother with a gift – a feat heretofore never accomplished by her father. In the beginning, Barbara’s gift-giving experience seems headed toward a similarly disappointing outcome, when, incredibly, an unexpected (or maybe not) finale has her being appreciated in spades! Her mother not only applauds Barbara’s gift, but she also dumps her entire collection of perfume bottles to make the point. Alas, even when she chooses wrong, Barbara still gets rewarded.
In the third and final memory, Barbara is unexpectedly (or maybe not) dreading the idea of performing as the lead robin in a school event, most probably after trying on the homemade costume with the “big red belly” where a lovely red-breast was supposed to be. With support from her mother (the "costume" maker!), Barbara renounces the lead role and becomes “a chipper in the chorus like everyone else.” Apparently blind to the idea (or maybe not) that someone else might benefit from her mother’s handiwork, Barbara and her mother dispose of the costume by tearing it up! Alas, even with a broken commitment and no appeasement, Barbara still gets rewarded.
Thus, no matter how things look at the onset, Barbara Walters holds in her mind’s eye the expectation of a good outcome. These are the memories she consciously and unconsciously rehearses over her lifetime….memories that remind her she knows how to work it, how to get rewarded, and how to manage authority to her advantage.
Note also that in Barbara’s worldview, there is no end game, as “I get my way” would suggest. Getting one’s way implies a contest with a finish line and obligatory winners and losers. She simply “wins” by being and by showing up first.
Now, if we were to wonder how she manages (both now and as a child) to work it so well, we might refer back to her memories for clues. For example, might Barbara have mentioned to her mother how much she missed and wanted her favorite doll? Most likely, yes. The expression “It makes me so sad for her” suggests Barbara knew exactly how tirelessly her mother would work to deliver the doll to her bedside once Barbara let her mother know she wanted it.
And in the second memory, might Barbara have signaled to her mother (with an uncharacteristically sad and forlorn expression and maybe a tear puddling in the eye) that surprising her mother with the appropriate Christmas gift meant the world to her? Again, the answer is yes. In fact, to diminish her own guilt for nearly crushing Barbara’s feelings, her mother denounces every other perfume bottle she owns!
And finally, might Walters have remained the lead robin in the performance if the costume her mother made had sported a more appealing red-breast, as opposed to a big red belly, as she describes it? Again, probably yes.
Quoting from http://www.thinkwriting.com/ … “Memories are windows we look through to see where we are and where we are going.” It is interesting to observe that Barbara Walters, now nearly 79 years old (9/25/29), has been portrayed as a straight-up, no-nonsense reporter for almost fifty years. Or put another way: She has been playing the “lead robin” in a litany of news performances for most of her professional life. As a “red-breasted” and energetic newswoman, she has made her mark (and her money, though maybe not enough until now), year after year after year.
However, what once had great appeal is now more of a big red belly situation. “But here’s the thing: I didn’t want to be the star,” Walters says (or maybe it's…"I didn’t want to be the star anymore" ...i.e., under the condition that I would have to wear a goofy costume my mother made, or under the condition I would have to leave real money on the table in a book contract negotiation when telling a special secret would garner me a much bigger signing bonus.).
So, to take herself off the pedestal (off the “respected/respectable” pedestal, as it were), Walters discloses a once taboo liaison with a married-at-the-time United States senator, in effect, tearing up her image as the straight-laced, venerable professional, in exchange for becoming “a chipper in the chorus …just like all the other kids” …or at least like all the other wealthy kids.
And in case she has a moment’s hesitation about giving up the senator, Walters will reflect on her earliest memories as a reminder that she never fails to work things to her advantage.
So, if you’re worried about her wanton disclosure, fret not. Even when she makes a wrong decision (like tearing up her own reputation), Barbara Walters has not done so unrewarded. As evidenced by her worldview, she knows how to work it.
(To read the early memories referenced in this post, see Mommy dearest: Barbara's Earliest Memories, dated Friday, June 6, 2008.)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
Well, my first instinct was right, but after I had chosen "I work it" I was second guessing that for "I get my way". But like you said, I finally figured that she really did not have an end or goal--it's the process of working it that she enjoys and is so good at and she knows it is all going to be good for her, whatever the outcome. Cool stuff.
Dang, man. I am woefully bad at this - I read but hardly ever comment any more. Just so you know, I'm still lurking. I have yet to get one right.
These things as I read them seem colored by my OWN worldview. For example: My mother would not have brought back a favorite doll, even if it meant a short walk or drive to the hospital, believing I needed to be independent. She would have told me she had plenty of perfume bottles but thank you anyway and stuck it in with the rest. Thinking she should be honest. Believing a commitment is a commitment she would have had me wear the robins costume, even if the red breast had been in the back. This is not to make my mother out to look bad at all, just to say that from my world view I was thinking that "Mothers rule" would have been her worldview. Go MOM!!!
Alas, I would have been wrong. again!!!!
As you explain, "I work it" makes poifect sense.
VERY intriguing, thanks for these....
Well wrong again. should have went with my first instinct which would have been right. I agree golf man.........cool stuff. And I couldn't believe Barbara Walters is 79 years old!! Good point Candis when you said we watch her to watch them. I consider myself a big fan of hers and in reality I'm a fan of hers because the people, places and things are really the intriguing parts of her showcase. In my opinion she lost a little of her "luster" by disclosing her affair with the married U.S. Senator for all the world to know. And what for? More money I suppose
Many thanks for reading and for commenting. I appreciate your contributions very much!
Please check out David Brooks' editorial today in the NYTimes in regard to Barrack Obama http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/13/opinion/13brooks.html?th&emc=th
Brooks' certainly lends evidence to Thinkwriter's perspective on Obama's worldview (see Thinkwriter March 20, 2008).
It sure does!!!! Uncanny yes?
My previous thank you is to all of you who commented - much appreciated!
I also meant to add in my previous comment that David Brooks has been - and assume he still is - a Barrack Obama fan. Just FYI.
Post a Comment